https://www.vuntz.net/journal/ mon journal - par Vincent en Mon, 09 Feb 2026 20:56:34 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Dotclear https://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2007/03/20/428-gnome-roadmap#c2155 urn:md5:08540b218ac6108e540502ad94211ed2 Wed, 21 Mar 2007 21:16:51 +0000 Vincent <p>liberforce: thanks for working on this! This is definitely something that's important. But you already know how important it is to me :-)</p> https://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2007/03/20/428-gnome-roadmap#c2154 urn:md5:4b3de1a713620e39cb63310c490a993d Tue, 20 Mar 2007 23:29:37 +0000 liberforce <p>I think that the GNOME Goals can help in giving a general direction for the desktop: concentrate on look, performance, HIG compliance, GTK 2.10 migration... The advantage is that they don't concentrate on a single app, but aim all of them. I've seen that Claudio Saavedra has added GNOME Goal #3... I'm gonna ask him if he's interested in team with me on that and let you know...</p> https://www.vuntz.net/journal/post/2007/03/20/428-gnome-roadmap#c2153 urn:md5:8f19c7dba2868d57e3104b3db25b3f06 Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:32:05 +0000 Greg Gilbert <p>I've always liked the Feature Plan lists that KDE has done in the past. Here's KDE 4 as an example: <a href="http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-4.0-features.html" title="http://developer.kde.org/development-versions/kde-4.0-features.html" rel="nofollow" rel="ugc nofollow">developer.kde.org/develop...</a><br /> <br /> While there's always inaccuracy when it comes to what actually gets finished and put into a release, it does go a long way to showing people the project's plans.</p>